The improved artillery will prove the words of “D.H.Hill†correctly, "this was not war, it was murderâ€. The greatest change would have to be the addition of the improved artillery. "Other than the Graphics which speaks for their self, and not to mention the terrain, which is now modeled with a lot more accuracy. Here's one of the developers describing the differences between Bull Run and the new game: Though you won't bother to tell us what exactly is WRONG with the gameplay beyond "he game quickly degenerates into a mindless click-fest around fields, searching for foreigners to bayonet.".Christ almighty. Technologically advanced RTS games like Rome: Total War or Cossacks IIĪ run for their money. Going to give the more established and, let's be honest, more
To have civil war buffs drooling over its adherence to historicalĪccuracy, from a strategic gameplay point of view, it's not exactly
While American Conquest: Divided Nation is sure It's probably the worst review I've read.well, ever. Are they serious? The American Civil War had some pretty bitchin' battles, and you've got the whole "Brother pitted against brother in an epic struggle of nationality versus morality" thing going on, hell, I can't see how it's not a good setting for a strategy game.The review is astounding in how it gives absolutely no info about the game at all, or even reviewing the basics of it. GSC Game World has decided to drag us by the knees through a standaloneĮxpansion for its 19th century war game American Conquest. Would make a more compelling backdrops for an RTS game.
In fact, we've seenĭrunken scuffles outside The Pig Fancier's Arms of a Friday night that Not the most interesting of conflicts for a game. Now let's face it - the American civil war was Computer and Video Games brings down the hammer on American Conquest: Divided Nation with this four (!!!) paragraph review, giving it a final verdict of 55/100.